Building features users do not need
A logistics startup spends four months building a route optimisation module because the founders were sure dispatchers wanted it. At launch, dispatchers keep using their spreadsheet, because the real pain was changing a booking after the truck had left.
- Why it happens
- Requirements came from assumptions and the loudest stakeholder, not from observing the work.
- What it costs
- Budget and months spent on low use features, and a late realisation that the real problem is still open.
- How we approach it
- We observe users in their context, interview across roles, map the current journey and rank problems by frequency and severity before any build decision, then test the riskiest assumptions with prototypes.
- What to measure
- Share of planned features backed by observed user evidence, and usage of shipped features in the first three months.